WACV 2027

SUREONA Benchmark and Vision-Language Model
for Surgical Reasoning

Alejandra Perez1,*, Anita Rau1,*, Busisiwe Mlambo1, Lee White1, Aina Brunet2,
Juan Verde3,4, Juan Caicedo5, Joël L. Lavanchy6,7, Adam Schmidt1,
Chinedu Nwoye1, Omid Mohareri1,†, Muhammad Abdullah Jamal1,†

1Intuitive Surgical Inc., USA2Hospital Universitari Bellvitge, Spain3IHU Strasbourg, France4University of Strasbourg, CNRS, France5Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Colombia6University Digestive Health Care Center – Clarunis, Switzerland7University of Basel, Switzerland

*,† Equal Contribution

SUREON overview

340expert-verified questions
10question types
69procedure types · 8 specialties

Loading benchmark examples…

Training database and benchmark

SUREON-DB

76,061

automatically pseudo-labeled training QA pairs

168 procedure types · 10 specialties

SUREON benchmark

340

expert-verified evaluation questions

69 procedure types · 8 specialties

Abstract

A capable surgical AI model should reason from visual evidence; yet, many existing surgical benchmarks can be partially solved without visual input, as models may exploit procedural priors or common anatomy–instrument interactions to infer answers from language alone. To address this, we introduce SUREON, a video question-answering (QA) dataset and benchmark designed to evaluate visually grounded surgical reasoning. Our pipeline generates QA pairs from narrated surgical academic videos, refines incorrect options using multiple models to reduce linguistic biases, and uses trained adversarial guessers to filter out questions answerable without visual evidence. The resulting dataset contains 76K training pairs covering 168 procedures and 10 specialties, alongside a benchmark of 340 questions across 10 categories verified by expert surgeons. Benchmarking leading commercial and open-source models shows that surgical visual reasoning remains largely unsolved—no model exceeds 53% accuracy and even expert surgeons reach only 64.9%. We also introduce SUREON-VLM, a baseline trained on our curated data that avoids language shortcuts, outperforms existing open-source models on SUREON, and matches larger specialist models on multiple standard surgical benchmarks. Our training ablations show that distractor refinement and blind curation strengthen visual grounding, increasing the multimodal gain from 8.7 to 29.1 percentage points while reducing the training set from 176.6K to 76K filtered samples. SUREON thus offers both a verified testbed for surgical visual reasoning and training data that strengthens visual grounding.

Address shortcuts during construction

Build the benchmark against the shortcuts.

  1. 01Ground the questions

    Generate questions from narrated surgical moments.

  2. 02Refine the distractors

    Use retrieval and multiple generators to reduce linguistic cues.

  3. 03Test without video

    Discard questions that blind guessers consistently answer correctly.

  4. 04Verify with surgeons

    Review the final benchmark for correctness and visual grounding.

SUREON addresses shortcut opportunities from the ground up.

SUREON construction pipeline

to challenge language shortcuts

Four-stage SUREON pipeline: narrated videos and transcripts generate QA pairs, multi-model retrieval refines distractors, blind guessers curate training and validation data, and surgeon review produces the final benchmark

SUREON-VLM

A surgical multimodal large language model

Reasoning supervision

76,061

SUREON-DB

Video QA pairs spanning 10 surgical question categories, generated from narrated academic surgical videos.

+

Perception supervision

Public surgical datasets

17 datasets

Images

Tool presence & localization · Anatomy recognition · Triplets · CVS

13 datasets

Clips

Phases · Steps · Actions

→

SUREON-VLM

Surgical multimodal
large language model

Surgical visual reasoning remains challenging.

With videoWithout videoHuman

Visual grounding and perception

Pipeline curation reduces language shortcuts.

Multimodal gain = with video − without video

Public benchmarks

SUREON pseudo-labels + public perception supervision

Citation